U++ framework: TreeCtrl » Distorted GUI / memory leak

Home » U++ Library support » TreeCtrl » Distorted GUI / memory leak

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Distorted GUI / memory leak [message #25582]

Mon, 01 March 2010 22:33

galious
Messages: 28
Registered: March 2008

Promising Member

Hi,

I'm trying to create a 'static-linked plugin system' like is done for e.g. plugin/bmp and plugin/png. The plugins should provide a GUI to allow the users to set some configuration. Providing the controls works for buttons, but adding a treectrl results in a distorted UI (the text in the provided is not centered anymore) and a memory leak.

What am I doing wrong? Is this not supported or is this a bug somewhere in the upp code?

For an example see the code below.

Best regards,

Martin

#include <CtrlLib/CtrlLib.h>
using namespace Upp;

/* Plugins */
static StaticCriticalSection sAnyStoragePlugin;
class StoragePlugin {
	typedef StoragePlugin *(*StorageFactory)();
	template <class T> static StoragePlugin *FactoryFn() { return new T; }
	static void AddPlugin(StorageFactory f) { INTERLOCKED_(sAnyStoragePlugin)Map().Add(f()); }
	static Array<StoragePlugin>& Map() { static Array<StoragePlugin> x; return x; }

public:
	template <class T> static void Register() { AddPlugin(&StoragePlugin::FactoryFn<T>); }
};

class DiskStorage : public StoragePlugin {
	TreeCtrl  c;  // <<<< Comment me to get a correct GUI and remove the memory leak
	Button    b;
};

INITBLOCK {
	StoragePlugin::Register<DiskStorage>();
}

/* App */
class DeBunny : public TopWindow {
	Button button;
	    
public:
	typedef DeBunny CLASSNAME;
	DeBunny() {
            Add(button.SetLabel("&I'm an Ultimate++ button!").VCenterPos(20).HCenterPos(200));
	};
};

GUI_APP_MAIN
{
	DeBunny().Run();
}

Report message to a moderator

Re: Distorted GUI / memory leak [message #25583 is a reply to message #25582]

Tue, 02 March 2010 05:41

mirek
Messages: 14291
Registered: November 2005

Ultimate Member

#include <CtrlLib/CtrlLib.h>

using namespace Upp;

/* Plugins */
static StaticCriticalSection sAnyStoragePlugin;
class StoragePlugin {

	typedef StoragePlugin *(*StorageFactory)();
	template <class T> static StoragePlugin *FactoryFn() { return new T; }

	static void AddPlugin(StorageFactory f) { INTERLOCKED_(sAnyStoragePlugin)Map().Add(f); }
	static Array<StorageFactory>& Map() { static Array<StorageFactory> x; return x; }

public:
	template <class T> static void Register() { AddPlugin(&StoragePlugin::FactoryFn<T>); }
};

class DiskStorage : public StoragePlugin {
	TreeCtrl  c;  // <<<< Comment me to get a correct GUI and remove the memory leak
	Button    b;
};

INITBLOCK {
	StoragePlugin::Register<DiskStorage>();
}

/* App */
class DeBunny : public TopWindow {
	Button button;
	    
public:
	typedef DeBunny CLASSNAME;
	DeBunny() {
            Add(button.SetLabel("&I'm an Ultimate++ button!").VCenterPos(20).HCenterPos(200));
	};
};

GUI_APP_MAIN
{
	DeBunny().Run();
}

Report message to a moderator

Re: Distorted GUI / memory leak [message #25607 is a reply to message #25583]

Wed, 03 March 2010 12:04

galious
Messages: 28
Registered: March 2008

Promising Member

Hi,

the 'problem' with replacing Plugin by Factory was I've to use something like the following code:

One<StoragePlugin> GetPlugin(int i) {
    One<StoragePlugin> plugin = (*StorageFactory(Map()[i]))();
    return plugin;
}

this will, I think, create a new StoragePlugin object each time I iterate through the plugins. In this way I won't able to store the state in the plugin, as each invocation will return a default plugin object.

I think I've to rewrite this a bit to iterate through all factories at initialisation and create an array of plugins (by using the method shown above) and afterwards use this list, or I'll create the plugins as singletons. I'll try these possibilities tonight.

One question still stands though, why did a Button work and a TreeCtrl didn't, just coincidence?

Best regards,

Martin

Report message to a moderator

Re: Distorted GUI / memory leak [message #25622 is a reply to message #25607]

Thu, 04 March 2010 07:32

mirek
Messages: 14291
Registered: November 2005

Ultimate Member

galious wrote on Wed, 03 March 2010 06:04

One question still stands though, why did a Button work and a TreeCtrl didn't, just coincidence?

Yes. Generally, there is a rule saying "no widgets before GUI_APP_MAIN". (Means: no widgets should be constructed in global constructors).

Mirek

Report message to a moderator

Re: Distorted GUI / memory leak [message #25623 is a reply to message #25622]

Thu, 04 March 2010 08:13

galious
Messages: 28
Registered: March 2008

Promising Member

Ahhh, thanks. I've rewritten to part to register the factory and afterwards I initialize an Array of plugins.

The memory leak was removed by added a virtual destructor (stupid me to forget it).

Thanks for your help,

Martin

Report message to a moderator

Previous Topic:	OptionTree loses check state
Next Topic:	Restrict drag&drop to one level

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Sun Jun 21 20:56:59 GMT+2 2026

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00577 seconds