Home » Community » U++ community news and announcements » namespace agnostic layouts refactored
| Re: namespace agnostic layouts refactored [message #58363 is a reply to message #58362] |
Sun, 08 May 2022 15:57   |
 |
Klugier
Messages: 1119
Registered: September 2012
Location: Poland, Kraków
|
Senior Contributor |
|
|
Hello Mirek,
Basic scenario works correctly (Gui16b), however bugs raised on GitHub are still present. When you switch from default frame to InsetFrame in Layout designer it leads to compilation error. The reason is simple, layout designer just do not prefix InsetFrame() function:
ITEM(Upp::EditString, text, SetFrame(InsetFrame()).LeftPosZ(48, 92).TopPosZ(8, 19))
// Should be...
ITEM(Upp::EditString, text, SetFrame(Upp::InsetFrame()).LeftPosZ(48, 92).TopPosZ(8, 19))
Just cosmetic - could we change "default" -> "Default" for default frames. All frames start from capital letter.
Do you also plan to fix #74? In my opinion for empty class it should have no properties (just empty area) like for empty ctrl entry in usc file.
Klugier
U++ - one framework to rule them all.
[Updated on: Sun, 08 May 2022 15:57] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
Current Time: Fri Sep 18 01:49:36 GMT+2 2026
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00934 seconds
|
U++ framework
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
