U++ framework: U++ Developers corner » WString vs Grapheme Cluster idea (with possible flaw)

Home » Developing U++ » U++ Developers corner » WString vs Grapheme Cluster idea (with possible flaw)

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: WString vs Grapheme Cluster idea (with possible flaw) [message #57114 is a reply to message #57110]

Wed, 26 May 2021 10:52

Didier
Messages: 740
Registered: November 2008
Location: France

Contributor

Well it really depends on how this is done.

One thing is for sure, all 4 000 000 000 graphemes won't be used at the same time
If we look at how virtual memory is managed, it's just about the same: we have a huge virtual memory but use only a tiny bit of it.
I don't know if it's feasable for graphemes since this has to be performant and we still would have the indirection table to manage which could be the killer

Why not use UTF32 ? sounds like the same (from my very far and poor UTF knowledge)

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		WString vs Grapheme Cluster idea (with possible flaw) By: mirek on Tue, 25 May 2021 14:25
		Re: WString vs Grapheme Cluster idea (with possible flaw) By: Didier on Tue, 25 May 2021 19:06
		Re: WString vs Grapheme Cluster idea (with possible flaw) By: mirek on Wed, 26 May 2021 08:24
		Re: WString vs Grapheme Cluster idea (with possible flaw) By: Didier on Wed, 26 May 2021 10:52
		Re: WString vs Grapheme Cluster idea (with possible flaw) By: mirek on Wed, 26 May 2021 11:27

Previous Topic:	Using BLITZ in release mode CLANG
Next Topic:	Using Pen with U++

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Sun Jun 21 11:48:04 GMT+2 2026

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00489 seconds