U++ framework
Do not panic. Ask here before giving up.

Home » Developing U++ » U++ Developers corner » umk static version
Re: umk static version [message #53396 is a reply to message #53394] Wed, 01 April 2020 09:44 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
amrein is currently offline  amrein
Messages: 278
Registered: August 2008
Location: France
Experienced Member
The main argument for using switch like -A -B is to be flexible and POSIX friendly. You don't have to follow strict rules on parameters order anymore.

Those commands are the same:

umk -B GCC.bm -A uppsrc ide
umk -A uppsrc -B GCC ide
umk -A uppsrc ide

It will break old umk script yes... but do we really need to stick with older and weak behavior?
Using umk in production scripts is so common nowadays?

 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Support for plug-in architecture
Next Topic: How to determine if U++ is being utilized...
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Mon Jun 22 00:16:40 GMT+2 2026

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00735 seconds