U++ framework: External resources » Static OOP (C++...) vs Dynamic OOP (CLOS...)

Home » Developing U++ » External resources » Static OOP (C++...) vs Dynamic OOP (CLOS...)

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: Static OOP (C++...) vs Dynamic OOP (CLOS...) [message #434 is a reply to message #432]

Sun, 01 January 2006 08:27

mirek
Messages: 14291
Registered: November 2005

Ultimate Member

Well, those "CLOS" gyus are totally off as all dynamic programming advocates. Even reading their material:

Quote:

C++ requires any redesign in the classes and methods to be completely consistent and correct across the entire application source code before a design modification can be compiled, let alone tested.

...and they think this is a disadvantage?!!!!

Is it so hard to understand that using static type checking, compiler catches many bugs for you, makeing development and refactoring of very large applications easy and safe?

Damn, sometimes I refactor code using C++ by invoking compiler on unfinished change just so he tells me what to fix (via errors indicating type/signature inconsistency).

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Static OOP (C++...) vs Dynamic OOP (CLOS...) By: fudadmin on Sun, 01 January 2006 03:44
		Re: Static OOP (C++...) vs Dynamic OOP (CLOS...) By: mirek on Sun, 01 January 2006 08:27
		Re: Static OOP (C++...) vs Dynamic OOP (CLOS...) By: gprentice on Sun, 01 January 2006 13:04
		Re: Static OOP (C++...) vs Dynamic OOP (CLOS...) By: mirek on Sun, 01 January 2006 14:34
		Re: Static OOP (C++...) vs Dynamic OOP (CLOS...) By: gprentice on Sun, 01 January 2006 13:17

Previous Topic:	dynamically updating programs....
Next Topic:	opinions about FOX-TOOLKIT

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Tue Sep 15 09:11:53 GMT+2 2026

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00872 seconds