U++ framework: U++ TheIDE: Compiling, Linking, Debugging of your packages » Buildtime defines such bmYEAR. Is it nessessary?

Home » U++ TheIDE » U++ TheIDE: Compiling, Linking, Debugging of your packages » Buildtime defines such bmYEAR. Is it nessessary?

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: Buildtime defines such bmYEAR. Is it nessessary? [message #26601 is a reply to message #26236]

Fri, 14 May 2010 15:15

mirek
Messages: 14291
Registered: November 2005

Ultimate Member

Shire wrote on Fri, 16 April 2010 04:08

CppBuilder::IncludesDefinesTargetTime()

Time t = GetSysTime();
cc << " -DbmYEAR=" << (int)t.year;
cc << " -DbmMONTH=" << (int)t.month;
cc << " -DbmDAY=" << (int)t.day;
cc << " -DbmHOUR=" << (int)t.hour;
cc << " -DbmMINUTE=" << (int)t.minute;
cc << " -DbmSECOND=" << (int)t.second;

What is role of these defines? When I use precompiled header, compiler produses warnings, that defines are changed.
Is it possible to remove them? For build date/time there are __DATE__ and __TIME__.

Well, if you would like to get e.g. Date, you would have to parse __DATE__. This way you can directly use Date constructor...

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Buildtime defines such bmYEAR. Is it nessessary? By: Shire on Fri, 16 April 2010 10:08
		Re: Buildtime defines such bmYEAR. Is it nessessary? By: mirek on Fri, 14 May 2010 15:15

Previous Topic:	Debug watch not showing arrays?
Next Topic:	MSC10 compilation issues

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Fri May 15 08:52:23 GMT+2 2026

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00467 seconds