U++ framework: Coffee corner

Home » Community » Coffee corner » Clang vs. GCC

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: Clang vs. GCC [message #25007 is a reply to message #24994]

Sun, 07 February 2010 10:13

mirek
Messages: 14291
Registered: November 2005

Ultimate Member

I believe it is Clang bug. By C++ standard, all types, including fundemantal types, have constructor and destructor.

At the moment, I am unable to find corresponding definition in C++ language definition, closest info I have found is this:

http://www.informit.com/guides/content.aspx?g=cplusplus& seqNum=431

BTW, it is in fact impossible to create container templates without this - STL has to do the same thing. Which is strange, considering Clang refusal to compile it.

Mirek

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Clang vs. GCC By: dolik.rce on Sat, 06 February 2010 23:10
		Re: Clang vs. GCC By: Novo on Sun, 07 February 2010 02:01
		Re: Clang vs. GCC By: mirek on Sun, 07 February 2010 09:55
		Re: Clang vs. GCC By: mirek on Sun, 07 February 2010 10:13
		Re: Clang vs. GCC By: gprentice on Sun, 07 February 2010 11:49
		Re: Clang vs. GCC By: Didier on Sun, 07 February 2010 12:11
		Re: Clang vs. GCC By: mirek on Sun, 07 February 2010 14:35
		Re: Clang vs. GCC By: Didier on Sun, 07 February 2010 14:47
		Re: Clang vs. GCC By: dolik.rce on Sun, 07 February 2010 15:35
		Re: Clang vs. GCC By: Sgifan on Wed, 24 February 2010 08:53

Previous Topic:	U++ for newbees
Next Topic:	Note about how classic OOP with C++ fails efficiency

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Tue Jun 23 12:50:17 GMT+2 2026

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00782 seconds