U++ framework: Coffee corner

Home » Community » Coffee corner » M$

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: MT [message #20495 is a reply to message #20492]

Fri, 20 March 2009 17:57

sergeynikitin
Messages: 748
Registered: January 2008
Location: Moscow, Russia

Contributor

It is the policy of monopoly and monopoly by itself is understandable and is not contested (and is not considered to be bad - it's just a fact).

I do not like the quality of software produced by Microsoft. I remember with horror the installation of the compiler MCS. To install the MCS needs to load the installation system heap additional libraries, which then burdening the system, forcing the system to work slowly.

In contrast - MINGW - sitting quietly in a corner and runs only when I was busy programming.

Of course you can say - it is necessary to program a computer to which you want to install all these libraries. But I have a small business. I want to save my money. And the need to spend or degradation of other applications is a natural irritation. And at Microsoft this position greatly.

People saying: foot stuck - All bird disappeared.

SergeyNikitin<U++>( linux, wine )
{
under( Ubuntu || Debian || Raspbian );
}

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		M$ By: mirek on Fri, 20 March 2009 14:54
		Re: MT By: mirek on Fri, 20 March 2009 15:00
		Re: MT By: sergeynikitin on Fri, 20 March 2009 15:07
		Re: MT By: andrei_natanael on Fri, 20 March 2009 16:43
		Re: MT By: sergeynikitin on Fri, 20 March 2009 17:57
		Re: MT By: cbpporter on Fri, 20 March 2009 18:47
		Re: MT By: sergeynikitin on Sat, 21 March 2009 10:42
		Re: MT By: sergeynikitin on Sat, 21 March 2009 14:37

Previous Topic:	Crazy(?) idea about debugging
Next Topic:	(Commercial) Upp consulting?!

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Sun Sep 20 03:12:00 GMT+2 2026

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00515 seconds