U++ framework: Releasing U++ » I believe we need rc2, right?

Home » Developing U++ » Releasing U++ » I believe we need rc2, right?

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: I believe we need rc2, right? [message #16425 is a reply to message #16411]

Sat, 14 June 2008 00:06

mdelfede
Messages: 1313
Registered: September 2007

Ultimate Contributor

luzr wrote on Fri, 13 June 2008 10:07

P.S.: I really do think that if possible, rcs should be IDENTICAL to final, except the file name. So the final should be obtained by renaming rc.

uhmmm... that poses some problems on debian.
Well... not the file name (I think, not tested...) but the internal version name, because of debian version ordering.

The '0pre' added in front of latest rc1 was needed because otherwise debian package manager thinks that

2008.1-rc1 is NEWER than 2008.1

refusing so to install the release package.
Adding '0pre-' solves it because debian says that

0pre-2008.xxxxxxx is OLDER than 2008.xxxxx

because of leading 0. Nicer solutions are welcome....

OTOH, if you meant "identical in content", I agree with you, there should be just minor bugfixes between rc and finals.
But, I don't agree too much leaving RCx out of version/splash screen...

Max

[Updated on: Sat, 14 June 2008 00:08]

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		I believe we need rc2, right? By: mirek on Fri, 13 June 2008 10:06
		Re: I believe we need rc2, right? By: mirek on Fri, 13 June 2008 10:07
		Re: I believe we need rc2, right? By: masu on Fri, 13 June 2008 10:30
		Re: I believe we need rc2, right? By: mdelfede on Sat, 14 June 2008 00:06
		Re: I believe we need rc2, right? By: Novo on Sat, 14 June 2008 03:23
		Re: I believe we need rc2, right? By: mirek on Fri, 27 June 2008 19:53

Previous Topic:	Mingw
Next Topic:	rc2

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Fri Sep 18 06:01:54 GMT+2 2026

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00502 seconds