U++ framework
Do not panic. Ask here before giving up.

Home » Developing U++ » U++ Developers corner » theide with libclang
Re: theide with libclang [message #59104 is a reply to message #59096] Wed, 02 November 2022 19:13 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
mirek is currently offline  mirek
Messages: 14291
Registered: November 2005
Ultimate Member
Lance wrote on Wed, 02 November 2022 00:15
Another more like a feature request:

Take for example, the following code:
class Person
{
	int age_;
public:
	int get_age()const { return age_; }
	void set_age(int age){ age_ = age; }
	__declspec(property(get=get_age, put = set_age)) int age;
};



theide/Assist++ will put a red rect at the beginning of __declspec, with error message ...'__declspec' attributes are not enabled; use '-fdeclspec'..., even though the flag has been turned on. This is kind of a fictitious example. The real issue here is, the flags I set in "Setup > Build Methods" for CLANG, under common c++ options
-std=c++20 -Wno-logical-op-parentheses -fdeclspec


is not respected by assist++.

So if someone wants to try some c++20 new language features, assist++ will stick to builtin option of '-std=c++14' and keep bugging him.


Hopefully solved by adding a field for additional libclang options to Assist settings (so that you can specify -std=c++20 there...)
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Impressive improvement in stl::vector when dealing with raw memory.
Next Topic: about unicode supporting
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Thu Jul 16 20:01:27 GMT+2 2026

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01841 seconds