U++ framework: U++ Core » StringBuffer size [BUG]

Home » U++ Library support » U++ Core » StringBuffer size [BUG]

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: StringBuffer size [BUG] [message #21412 is a reply to message #21409]

Tue, 19 May 2009 07:27

mirek
Messages: 14291
Registered: November 2005

Ultimate Member

leidner wrote on Mon, 18 May 2009 22:31

Hi,

While it is true that the default text may simplify debugging,

I agree with the poster that this behavior violates
developers expectations (I don't know of any other API where
you have to call clear() before using an object the first time),
and because of that, it makes it more likely that bugs get
introduced in the first place.

Would you consider changing this so as to initialize with the
empty string?

Best regards
Jochen

But that would defeat the purpose of StringBuffer. You are using the constructor variant with len parameter mostly if you need to "convert" external data to String, for example in LoadFile.

If you want to start with empty string, please do not ask for non-empty one... (just do not put the length into the constructor).

Mirek

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		StringBuffer size [BUG] By: amando1957 on Thu, 27 November 2008 18:54
		Re: StringBuffer size [BUG] By: bytefield on Thu, 27 November 2008 20:09
		Re: StringBuffer size [BUG] By: leidner on Tue, 19 May 2009 04:31
		Re: StringBuffer size [BUG] By: mirek on Tue, 19 May 2009 07:27
		Re: StringBuffer size [BUG] By: piotr5 on Tue, 26 May 2009 14:44
		Re: StringBuffer size [BUG] By: cbpporter on Tue, 26 May 2009 15:04

Previous Topic:	date filter bug?
Next Topic:	LocalProcess in Core

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Mon May 11 01:32:52 GMT+2 2026

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00450 seconds